Larry Chapman’s Blog

Results-Driven Worksite Wellness

New USPSTF Recommendations on Dietary Supplements

Source: United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and JAMA

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides a copy of 3 articles and a patient education insert in this week’s online JAMA publications. The 4 articles have been combined into one PDF and include:

  • The USPSTF issuance itself
  • An explanatory article with summaries of data findings for physicians
  • An objective analysis of the pro’s and con’s of the recommendations
  • An educational insert for patients/employees about the recommendations

This new issuance of recommendations from USPSTF covers vitamin, mineral, and multivitamin supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer.  Cardiovascular diseases and cancer accounts for slightly more than half of all annual deaths in the U.S. each year.  Approximately half of the U.S. adult population that have been surveyed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) indicate they had used at least one dietary supplement in the previous 30 days. Dietary supplements constitute a $50 billion industry in the U.S. The recommendations of the USPSTF include the balance of harms and benefits of the preventive practice under review.

The summary of the main recommendations from the USPSTF are:

Population Characteristics Recommendations of USPSTF Strength of Evidence**
Community-dwelling nonpregnant adults* The USPSTF recommends against the use of beta carotene or vitamin E supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer.  

“D”

Community-dwelling nonpregnant adults The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the use of multivitamin supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. See the Practice Considerations section for additional information regarding the “I” statement.  

“I”

Community-dwelling nonpregnant adults The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the use of single – or pared-nutrient supplements (other than beta carotene and vitamin E for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. See the Practice Considerations section for additional information regarding the “I” statement.  

“I”

* = This means adults that are not institutionalized and not pregnant.

** = “D” means enough evidence to recommend against,  “I” means insufficient evidence to recommend for its use.

Why is this important?

These 3 articles and an educational insert combined into one PDF document are important because they provide an in-depth explanation of the research methodology and scientific conclusions concerning the use of vitamin, mineral, and multivitamin supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer. The practice of dietary supplementation is a huge industry and I believe is used by a significant portion of American adults as a substitute for adopting healthy lifestyle choices.  “Denial” is not just a river in Africa.  The economic ramifications and behavior change implications of dietary supplementation are likely to be enormous and pivotal to adoption of healthy behaviors by individual employees and their family members.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, the PDF answer the questions…”Can some portion of our national heart disease and cancer deaths be prevented by selected dietary supplement use? And “What specific dietary supplement (i.e., beta carotene or Vitamin E) should be avoided?”
  • Next, skim the 4 document for the major findings that are particularly relevant to your organization and population.
  • Next, determine what specific uses you might put this information to and the communication channels that might be used, particularly the 4th document which is a patient/employee education piece.
  • Next, examine the role that the covered dietary supplements play in your wellness program targeting and interventions and consider introducing this information while pointing out the confirmed health effects of regular physical activity and sound nutrition practices.
  • Next, if you choose to hold an educational session on recommended dietary supplement strategies use it to help people review the objective evidence for various practices and explain how powerful the placebo effects are in all of us.
  • Finally, periodically examine the dietary supplement issues of your work force and consider whether additional program interventions and activities are needed.

In summary, this evidence-based set of recommendations on selected dietary supplement use is an important new finding that has significant economic and behavioral implications for all working populations.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

The Global Mental Health Disease Burden: 1990-2019

Source: The Lancet Psychiatry

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides a copy of the recent article published in the respected peer review journal The Lancet Psychiatry on the Global Burden of Mental Health Diseases and Conditions and includes nine major mental health diseases/conditions as well as a catch-all category. The authors measured the global, regional, and national prevalence, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYS), years lived with disability (YLDs), and years of life lost (YLLs) for these 10 mental disorders from 1990 to 2019. This information covers some 204 countries and represents a comprehensive world-wide look at global mental health needs.  The 14-page peer reviewed article also contains a number of useful graphics highlighting the data which is particularly valuable for companies involved in global markets and global trade.

The mental health issues addressed in the article include:

  • depressive disorders
  • anxiety disorders
  • bipolar disorders
  • schizophrenia
  • autism spectrum disorders
  • conduct disorders
  • attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders
  • eating disorders
  • idiopathic developmental intellectual disabilities
  • and a residual category of other mental disorders

Why is this important?

This article is important because it provides in one place all the relevant data on the changing prevalence of major mental health needs, diseases and conditions on a global basis. This data is particularly useful due to the current employer concern for the mental health needs of employees and their family members.  This primarily post-COVID concern ranges from the traditional clinical mental health conditions described in the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) published by the American Psychiatric Association to the emerging issues of mental well-being that have gained popularity as we recover from 2+ years of unprecedented global pandemic. This article helps identify the magnitude of the current mental health clinical disease burden facing employers, health care providers, governmental healthcare funders and private health plans

What can you do with this document?

  • First, the article answers the questions…”How much mental health disease/disorders are we currently experiencing? And “How has this disease burden changed over the past 30 years?”
  • Next, skim the document for the major types of findings that are relevant to your organization and population.
  • Next, determine what specific mental health issues identified in the article are relevant given the comparative data available through your health plan vendor(s).
  • Next, examine those data points for their significance in defining the mental health needs of your population and whether they can be used as baseline measures for future comparison purposes.
  • Next, if you chose to implement any mental health interventions for your organization determine if the data in this article can be used to help you design the intervention(s).
  • Finally, periodically examine the presenting mental health needs of your work force and consider whether additional program interventions and activities are indicated.

In summary, this very credible measurement of the mental health disease burden on a global basis provides a useful evidence-based set of reference points for estimating and measuring current and future mental health needs of working populations.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Evidence-Based Recommendations on Reducing Obesity

Source: Community Prevention Services Task Force (CPSTF) , DHHS

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides an easy-to-read set of evidence-based interventions for reduction of obesity and overweight status among working adults.  It is a set of formal recommendations from the Community Prevention Service Task Force (CPSTF) within the federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The recommendations highlight communities, worksites, schools and healthcare settings.  It is very short on definitive guidance for worksite-based obesity interventions but the span of evidence from other settings helps define what is likely to work in workplace settings.

Why is this important?

This infographic is important because it provides in one place all the recommended federal guidance on evidence-based interventions for weight management and control.  This is important because it potentially places in the hands of workplace wellness professionals the best science, we have on interventions for reducing obesity and overweight status in our working population. This document provides a clear and concise reference starting point for researchers, practitioners, and program administrators to move forward with science-based modifications for improved population health. The Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) recently estimated that obesity accounts for approximately 40% of all the cancer cases in the U.S. and an equally large proportion of the heart disease and diabetes care in our national population.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, the document answers the question…”What weight management interventions should be implemented in which settings?”
  • Next, skim the document for the major types of interventions that can be implemented in your worksite.
  • Next, determine the interventions you would like to introduce in your organization.
  • Next, have those interventions and the accompanying budget resources approved by senior management.
  • Next, implement those interventions that are approved by senior management.
  • Next, determine if aggregate screening data or aggregate health risk assessment data comparisons from previous to current periods indicate any improvement in the prevalence of obesity and overweight status in your work force.
  • Finally, review your progress in managing this health risk periodically and consider whether additional weight management interventions are needed.

In summary, this evidence-based infographic provides a very useful piece of guidance for all workplace wellness professionals in dealing with the major health risk of obesity and overweight status in their working populations.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

CDC’s Definitive Recommendations on Immunizations and Vaccines

Source: CDC, March, 2022

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides the just-released, definitive guidance on all recommended immunizations over the human lifespan for the U.S. population. The recommendations are in two parts; Part 1 is for adults 19 and up and Part 2 is for infants and children through age 18.  This is the most comprehensive set of vaccination recommendations issued by the federal government to date and supersedes all previous federal guidance. A very handy, graphically attractive reference with plenty of detailed qualifications and comments. A timely issuance in an era where vaccine hesitancy has been steadily growing and where all parties involved need a common reference point for disease prevention.  However, I do believe that we still need to maintain a fairly high level of personal vigilance when considering our own and our family members potential reactivity to the vaccines involved for both health status effects as well as economic liability issues.

Why is this important?

This infographic PDF is important because it provides in one place all the recommended federal guidance on all currently available immunizations.  This is important because it potentially places in the hands of every employee the best science we have on the use of vaccination as a major health protection and disease prevention strategy for our population. This document provides a clear and concise reference starting point for researchers, administrators and clinicians to move forward with science-based modifications for improved population health.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, the document answers the question…”What immunizations(aka vaccinations) should be given at what ages and what are the possible contra-indications?”
  • Next, skim the document for the major diseases that affect the population you are working with.
  • Next, identify where, when and how this infographic should be used to educate volunteers, staff, employees and managers.
  • Next, determine your preliminary plan for its distribution and use and have it approved by management.
  • Next, carry out your distribution and use strategies.
  • Next, determine if the immunization issue should be included in your annual screening protocol and consider whether you should print out the document and provide it to participants as part of your screening process.
  • Finally, review your progress periodically and consider whether additional activities regarding immunizations are needed.

In summary, this infographic document provides a very useful science-based piece of comprehensive guidance for all employees to consider (and potentially pass on to their PCP.) to consider the best science we have on the use of immunizations for health protection and improvement.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Organizational Best Practices for Employee Mental Health

Source: JOEM

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides a important recent JOEM article that suggests a practical approach for examining an employer’s capability and efforts to provide mental health support for their employees.  This article further highlights an extensive effort to develop evidence-based recommendations for employers in dealing with how they support the mental health needs of their employees. This issue is particularly timely and relevant because of the recognition of COVID-19 related anxiety, depression and social isolation effects associated with the recent pandemic.  These evidence-based criteria are being developed for use in a national program of recognition awards for employers that seek to use “best practices” to help care for their employees’ mental health and mental well-being needs. A detailed table of suggested criteria is included in the article.

The 8 areas of recommended criteria for further refinement presented in the article include:

  • Culture
  • Robust Mental Health Benefits.
  • Employer-Sponsored Mental Health Resources
  • Workplace Policies and Practices
  • Healthy Work Environment
  • Leadership Support
  • Outcomes Measurement
  • Innovation

Why is this important?

This articles provides a blueprint for assessing the efforts of employers to protect and improve the mental health illness and well-being of their work force.  It lays out possible criteria that can be used to score how an employer is doing in meeting the mental health and well-being needs of their population. This useful evidence-based typology provides an excellent starting point for examination of employer support for employee mental health and mental well-being practices. This article can help you address a growing concern of most senior management groups.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, the article answers the question…”How can we improve our employee’s mental health and mental well-being?”
  • skim the document for the major issues and the suggested criteria presented by the authors.
  • Next, identify where and when this information should be used to educate volunteers, staff, employees and managers.
  • Next, determine how adequate your current approach is to addressing employee mental health and mental well-being issues.
  • Next, determine how you might enhance your employer’s or client’s approach to this issue.
  • Finally, review your progress periodically in developing an enhanced practical approach to employee mental health and mental well-being.

In summary, this article provides a useful evidence-based framework for assessing your organizations’ efforts in meeting the mental health and mental well-being needs of your work force. This framework can be used to open up the organizational discussion on these issues.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Total Economic Impact of Virgin Pulse Platform

Source: Forrester Reports

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides an important report produced by the well-respected business consulting and analytics company Forrester.  The report examines 4 large clients of the Virgin Pulse Engage platform with 264,500 eligible employees and approximately 50,000 users of the platform.  The report examines economic savings projections for both selected traditional ROI and selected VOI components which makes this a very unusual program evaluation report. The Report highlights a proprietary framework and methodology for risk-adjusted economic analysis developed by Forrester called the Forrester Total Economic ImpactTM  methodology.   All savings were risk-adjusted over a three year period. All 4 of the Virgin Pulse clients have used the Engage platform for several years.

Highlights from the Report include:

  • Avoided cost of employee attrition equaled $9,048,242 .
  • Reduced healthcare costs of $8,280,615.
  • Avoided cost of fatigue related mistakes of $1,479,231.
  • Avoided cost of sick leave absenteeism of $6,655,413.
  • Decreased administrative costs of $5,489,776.
  • Total program direct costs of $11,622,577.
  • A cost/benefit ratio of 1:1.62 or an ROI of 162% for the 3 year period.
  • An Net Present Value (NPV) of $19,137,500.

Why is this important?

This Report is important because it provides a detailed business-based rather than academic analysis of a virtual Wellness platform combined with incentives and it examines important traditional ROI and non-traditional VOI metrics.  It is also important because it establishes a risk-adjusted analytic methodology that has business credibility.  It is a conservative projection of economic return using newer Wellness technologies. This Report offers some excellent insights for reinstituting ROI methodology for today’s employee Wellness efforts that is driven by business realities rather than academic expectations.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, skim the document for the major issues and findings presented by the authors.
  • Next, identify where and when this information should be used to educate volunteers, staff, employees and managers.
  • Next, determine what analytic methods outlined in the Report can be applied to your own employee wellness program ROI assessment.
  • Next, determine how you might capitalize on the implications of these findings in the design and execution of your employee wellness program and implement them.
  • Finally, review your progress periodically in developing a business-centric approach to ROI evaluation of your Wellness program.

In summary, this Report provides an important newer perspective on the economic analysis of employee Wellness programming and supports a much more strategic perspective on the role of these kinds of efforts in enhancing the Human Capital in our work organizations.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Lifestyle Medicine and Disease Reversal

Sourse: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides an important article that addresses the potential for disease reversal. Published in an international scientific journal it raises the core premises of Lifestyle Medicine and examines the scope of potential economic benefit from the growth and application of this discipline.  Through the presentation of 4 patient case vignettes, the article offers a tantalizing glimpse of what happens when you begin to incorporate wellness interventions into clinical practice settings and populations.

The case vignettes included:

Case #1 is a 47-year-old male who recalls gradually worsening illness starting around the age of 25 that he partially attributes to poor food choices and opioid use. By the age of 36, he recalls knowing that he had “undeniable, serious illness,” and by the age of 38, he weighed over 400 pounds and suffered from severe sleep apnea, asthma and trouble breathing, eczema, allergies, hypertension (SBP/DBP= 255/155 on 2 medications), high total cholesterol (300 mg/dL), high triglycerides (279 mg/dL), and chronic shoulder and joint pain.

Case #2 is a 49-year-old female diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on 3 January 2020. At this time, her fasting blood glucose was measured at 266 mg/dL, and HbA1c was 10.9%. She conducted daily glucose monitoring, was prescribed Metformin for glucose control and described herself as “living on pain meds” for headaches and joint pain. She began the Kaiser Medical Weight Management Program at a starting weight of 205 lbs.

Case #3 is a 50-year-old male who reported suffering from severe edema, hypokalemia, pre-diabetes, fatty liver, high blood pressure, obesity, severe arthritis, and “pinched nerves”. He had frequent clinician visits, as well as occasional ER and urgent care visits. He also required physical therapy and chiropractic care, his physician recommended gastric bypass surgery, and he was taking various medications.

Case #4 is currently a 60-year-old female who, prior to 2009, was experiencing high blood pressure, metabolic syndrome, constant migraines, frequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) or interstitial cystitis, frequent illnesses (cold, flu, etc.), rosacea, fatty liver syndrome, and hypothyroidism. She reports being on a number of medications.

Why is this important?

This article is important because it provides a detailed analysis of what can happen when you implement wellness and lifestyle interventions into 4 representative patient’s lives.  The analysis examines each of the individual’s current morbidity and health care use patterns and details the cost changes in their lives subsequent to lifestyle changes.  This information covers the personal or individual effects rather than the population centric effects.  It shows the significant potential health and economic effects of more aggressive wellness interventions with individuals.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, skim the document for the major issues and findings presented by the authors.
  • Next, identify where and when this information should be used to educate volunteers, staff, employees and managers.
  • Next, determine where Lifestyle Medicine and wellness interventions can be addressed in your wellness program.
  • Next, determine how you might emphasize the implications of these findings in the design and execution of your employee wellness program.
  • Finally, review your progress in disease reversal and Lifestyle Medicine as you approach the next budget period and map out some new initiatives to address wellness interventions and/or Lifestyle Medicine.

In summary, this document provides interesting patient case insights about the use of wellness interventions under the auspices of Lifestyle Medicine and their potential to significantly reduce health care utilization and health care costs. It seems that this information should have great relevance to our senior managers and business decision-makers.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Strengthening your efforts against Diabetes

Sourse: USPSTF and JAMA

What is this about?

This edition of Connections newsletter provides two recent very important articles/studies on our need to address prediabetes and Type 2 diabetes in our working population.  In June, 2021 an original investigation article was published in JAMA entitled “Trends in Prevalence of Diabetes and Control of Risk Factors in Diabetes Among US Adults, 1999-2018”. Some of its highlighted findings are identified below.  The following August, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued a new recommendation on the need to screen for prediabetes and Type 2 diabetes more aggressively, particularly in working populations.  Both these documents are combined into one as the download in this edition of Connections.

Some of the main findings reported in the article on “Trends” included the following:

  • Diabetes accounts for approximately 24% of all U.S. health care expenditures.
  • Diabetes was defined by self-report of diabetes diagnosis, fasting plasma glucose level of 126 mg/dL or more, or hemoglobin A1c (HbA) level of 6.5% or more.
  • Three risk factor control goals were: individualized HbA(A1c) targets, blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level less than 100 mg/dL.
  • The prevalence of diabetes among the U.S. population increased from 9.5% in 1999 to 14.3% in 2017 – one of the highest rates of increase in the world.
  • Only 1 in 5 of those with diabetes met all 3 risk factor control goals (fasting glucose, BP and HbA(A1c))

Some of the main findings reported in the “USPSTF” article included the following:

  • An estimated 13% of all US adults (18 years or older) have diabetes, and 34.5% meet the criteria for prediabetes.
  • The USPSTF recommends screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in adults aged 35 to 70 years who have overweight or obesity conditions.

Why is this important?

These two documents are important because they highlight the very substantial morbidity and economic burden that diabetes represents to our adult population.  In addition, diabetes as a disease process and as it progresses, exacts a huge personal toll on an individuals’ activity levels, food choices and co-morbidities, let alone its documented role as a major risk factor for COVID complications and premature death. With 2020’s almost 10% increase in national health care spending its probably time to get more serious about diabetes.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, skim the document for the major issues and findings they present.
  • Next, identify where and when this information can be used to educate employees and managers.
  • Next, determine where diabetes should be addressed, such as adding blood sugar level and the HbA (A1c) to your preventive screening battery of tests. (If you haven’t already!)
  • Next, determine how you might emphasize the three key risk factors (HbA(A1c), BP and LDL) in various areas in your program.
  • Next, consider diabetes as a special claims analysis metric bundle for your long term health plan management strategy.
  • Finally, review your progress as you approach the next budget period and map out some new initiatives to address diabetes and prediabetes.

In summary, these two documents provide a number of important informational insights about the importance and practicality of targeting and preventing diabetes as an important clinical problem of our employee populations. It seems like it is time to get more serious about diabetes in our workplace wellness efforts.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Humana Wellness Program Evaluation Study- “GO365”

Source: Humana , Louisville, KY

What is this about?

This edition of ‘Connections newsletter’ provides the results of a new large-scale multi-employer case study of the “Go365” wellness program with more than 135,000 fully insured employees of small and large businesses. The case study examines engagement levels, participant claims costs trends, health satisfaction levels, self-reported productivity levels, employer loyalty, preventive service use, happiness level and selective health care utilization changes over a period of 4 years. The authors divided the experimental population into small employers (2-99 EEs) and large employers (>100EEs). In a key finding, the Go365 Fully Insured Outcomes Study revealed that as participating associates became more engaged in the wellness program, their claims experience were more likely to improve, in addition to their health perception and healthcare utilization. 5 levels of engagement in the wellness program were tracked for all participants during a 4 year period.  This included Blue, Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum levels based on the amount of preventive screening and key wellness behaviors completed.

Some of the main findings reported in the study are as follows:

  • The more program participation the lower their health care costs. (All groups)
  • High-engaged members (Platinum/Gold Status) experienced an average of 24 percent lower claims costs, compared to low-engaged members (Blue/Bronze Status).
  • Over the course of the analysis period, high-engaged small group members saved an average of $58 in healthcare claims per member per month (PMPM), relative to low-engaged members.
  • In large groups, high-engaged members saved an average of $118 in healthcare claims PMPM, relative to low-engaged members. ($1,416 per participant per year savings)
  • High-engaged small group members had 6 percent more preventive care physician visits and 33 percent fewer emergency room visits, compared to low-engaged members.
  • High-engaged large group members had 2 percent more preventive care physician visits and lowered emergency room visits by 32 percent, compared to low-engaged members.
  • High-engaged employees rated their overall health satisfaction as good to excellent, 5 percent more than low-engaged employees.

Why is this important?

This document is important because it reports on one of the largest, multi-employer evaluations of employee wellness program outcomes yet completed.  The report provides a number of useful insights on the higher order results of a very large number of fully insured employees over a 4 year period.  This study provides fairly strong evidence that employee wellness programs can significantly impact on health care costs, utilization and health perceptions. The information in this document can be used to leverage additional wellness programming activities for employees.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, download and skim the document for the major issues it addresses.
  • Next, visit the link identified in the report for more information on the study.
  • Next, identify where this information can be used with your employees and management.
  • Next, using a “snipping tool” to copy selected graphics and table information that you want to use and mount them into PPT slides.
  • Next, be sure to cite the source of the study. (Humana)
  • Then, share the information with your intended audience(s).

In summary, this document provides a number of important informational insights about what Humana’s GO365 Wellness Program accomplished during a 4 year period with more than 135,000 fully-insured participants from multiple small and large employers.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.

Employer Survey on 2021 Wellness Programming Trends

Source: SentryHealth, Louisville, KY

What is this about?

This edition of ‘Connections newsletter’ provides a PDF file of a 24-page report of a survey of U.S. employers about their current and future plans for health and wellness activity that was released in February 2021.  Unfortunately, the authors don’t tell you their sample size or “N”, or when the survey was performed, but there are a number of important early patterns and insights presented in the report. Employers who were surveyed were primarily 100 – 999 employees in size and primarily mid-west in terms of location. A wide range of industries are reflected in the data.

Some of these insights are as follows:

  • 84% offer a wellness program.
  • 62% of those do it to “improve overall well-being.”
  • 25% of those do it to “lower health care costs.”
  • 14% don’t offer a program and 56% of those don’t believe employees will participate, 31% cited the expense involved and 31% said that it is too hard to manage.
  • 28% reported greater than 70% participation.
  • 78% use incentives to increase employee participation.
  • 58% of those use premium reductions and 41% of those use gift cards.
  • Percent of employees affected by COVID-19: 86% mental health, 75%+ physical health and 49% financial health.
  • Top 2021 concerns: 31% addressing COVID-19 concerns, 29% lowering health care costs, and 21% increasing employee participation.
  • Top 2021 and beyond wellness activities in order of their occurrence:
    • 80% EAP
    • 73% stress and anxiety
    • 64% well-being program
    • 53% financial wellness
    • 51% eHealth portals
    • 49% onsite vaccines
    • 47% depression
    • 45% fitness challenges
    • 44% smoking cessation
    • 42% standing desks
    • 40% disease management
    • 37% health coaching
    • 35% weight loss
    • 31% injury prevention
    • 21% onsite activities
    • 14% fitness trackers

Why is this important?

This document is important because it provides several important comparison insights about what other employers are now doing for employee wellness.  This allows wellness professionals to give current comparisons of what other employers are doing in the employee wellness area. The information in this document can be used to leverage additional wellness activities for employees.

What can you do with this document?

  • First, download and skim the document for the major issues it addresses.
  • Next, identify where this information can be used with employees and management.
  • Next, using a “snipping tool” to remove those graphics and information that you want to use and mount them into PPT slides.
  • Next, be sure to cite the source.
  • Then, share the information with your intended audience(s).

In summary, this document provides a number of useful informational insights about what other employers are currently doing about wellness in 2021 and what they will likely be doing in the near future.

(Everyone can now download this document)

Click here to download this document

If you have any problem downloading the document go to our website and submit a comment.

I hope this tool helps you reach your wellness programming goals!  Drop me a note and let me know if you found it to be helpful.